Posts Tagged ‘Health care’

Subverting Success

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell famously said that the number one priority of Republicans is to make Obama a one-term president. As a necessary conclusion from this assertion, Republicans are trying to deny any kind of success to Obama. Even if that means deliberately subverting a program that aims to expand health care coverage to people. Reading things like this just makes me sick.

Read the rest of this entry »

Health care for the discerning shopper

Over and over we are hearing that health care has to become more of a market like retail, or maybe dining: educated consumers would comparison shop for the cheapest quality care, thus keeping prices down. This is the logic behind high-deductible insurance plans, which are on the upswing: “These plans give employees some ‘skin in the game’ and an incentive to not only better manage their health but also to be a more educated consumer” one CEO says. Funny thing, though: if health care is supposed to be more like coupon-clipping and waiting for sales, it appears that somebody forgot to tell the doctors.

Read the rest of this entry »

Delinking Health Care

You’d be pretty annoyed if your cell phone contract followed your job, or if your employer dictated which brand of car you could drive. Yet when it comes to health insurance, the notion that your employer gets to decide for you, and that if you switch jobs there is no guarantee you can keep your coverage, is pretty ingrained into the minds of Americans. Is there a good reason to keep doing things this way? I don’t see one.

Read the rest of this entry »

Pawlenty’s content-free campaign

So far, the campaign for the Republican Presidential nomination has been hilarious to watch. You have Donald Trump shooting for the stars, and then plummeting back to Earth. You have Newt bumbling all over the place, with enough personal baggage to give cost a small fortune when boarding a commercial airplane. You have Rick Santorum trying to run while haunted by the ghost of Google. Michelle Bachmann is around to apparently stage a real campaign, much to the delight of Democrats and the media alike. Then you have Tim Pawlenty, losing to Herman Cain (who must be an anti-speed reader) in the South Carolina debate. Nevertheless, TPaw seems to keep on running.

If Minnesotans have had their fill of Pawlenty, and we have, why does he think the rest of the country will want what he’s selling? Who knows? But he seems to be running under the assumption that the best way to win the Republican nomination is to appear “saner” than the rest of the candidates, all while running a completely content-free campaign, full of slogans and absurd assumptions, but quite short on facts. His ridiculous economic plan, to grow at 5% a year for a decade (which hasn’t happened since the Great Depression, even under his hero Ronald Reagan), has been panned by all rational economists, even Republicans. His just-as-laughable “Google test” for government services has been mock just as much (as many commenters have pointed out, since Pawlenty himself exists on Google, doesn’t that mean we don’t need him in government?). His tax plan would balloon the deficit by cutting taxes lower than they are now, even though federal taxes are already at historical lows. But still he clings to these ideas like a bit of flotsam in a storm, hoping that his competitors will drown before him.

It would be nice if he were challenged on some of these things. Why can’t somebody in the media put this graphic (courtesy of Paul Krugman) in front of him and ask him what it means for health care and what he will do about it if President:

Pawlenty had eight years as governor of Minnesota to do something about health care. He didn’t. No bending the cost curve, no successful pilot programs, no real effort to provide health insurance to under-served populations other than what was already in effect. Health care spending rising out of control is one of those serious issues that demands reality-based solutions. Even saying, “I don’t care that people can’t afford health insurance and I will not have the government step into the health care market” would be more honest that some of his current campaign proposals.

I used to think TPaw was Minnesota’s Don Quixote, tilting at windmills without a chance of getting the nomination. Given the terrible field for the Republicans so far, however, it’s not as impossible as I once thought, and that’s a bit frightening. I’ve lived through eight years of Pawlenty in Minnesota, kicking the can down the road, raising taxes without admitting it, and doing little to grow jobs or improve the human and physical capital of the state. I would prefer not to see that happen to the rest of the country. But he’ll try, sloganeering and flip-flopping his way towards a hoped-for nomination.

Opting out of the health care market

Lawsuits have been filed, conflicting court decisions have been handed down, and ultimately, the Supreme Court will decide whether Obama’s health care reform will be constitutional. The main argument proffered by those against the bill is that the law regulates economic inaction, something that opponents claim Congress does not have the power to do. But is that really the case? Is it possible to opt out of the health care economy in this country? I’m not a lawyer, but I think that the answer to this question can be found in a law passed 25 years ago, one that everybody takes for granted. A law that has done a great deal to put us in the situation we are in today.

Read the rest of this entry »

Anti-Union Sentiment Redux

Several Jimmy John’s restaurants may unionize. It’s always fun to peruse the reader comments in Star Tribune stories, if you are wondering what the great mass of Christine O’Donnell conservatives are thinking, and this story is no different: several commenters claim that they will no longer patronize Jimmy John’s if they unionize. Like much conservative thought, I don’t get it.

Read the rest of this entry »

Future reform

While some media conservatives were ranting about the end of American civilization after the health care vote last weekend, there were a few thinking ones who were addressing what the Obama health reforms meant for the country and for people going into the future. True, if you blinked you would have missed the intelligent commentary, but it is out there, and yes, it does have some value in figuring out where to go next.

Read the rest of this entry »

The battle is won, now the fight moves on…

I’d be lying if I didn’t admit to some pretty strong emotions when I watched those 216 votes come in last night on C-SPAN. As somebody who, perhaps foolishly, believes that the point of politics isn’t to merely score more points than the other people, but to enact real programs that lead to a better life for everybody, these kinds of victories are few and far between. Considering that health care reform has been almost a century in coming, these things are far between indeed. This may be the most important bill I will see in my lifetime, on par with Social Security and Medicare. To undertake a significant transformation of how health care is viewed in this country has been foolhardy; to see it succeed is nothing short of astonishing.

Read the rest of this entry »

No room for empathy

The statements from many Republicans these days about health care are unnerving. Governor Pawlenty says that maybe hospitals should be able to turn away indigent people who need treatment. Earlier, he vetoes a reasonable GAMC extension, and Republicans in the House vow to uphold his veto despite overwhelmingly voting for the extension in the first place. At the Health Care Summit in DC, Republicans don’t seem to care about people who can’t afford health insurance; it’s “their problem“. When Representative Louise Slaughter told a story about a woman being forced to use her dead sister’s ill-fitting dentures because she couldn’t afford dentures on her own, Republicans mocked the story. Rush Limbaugh, scum that he is, says that Democrats should be thrilled with that, because Democrats love recycling, after all. He also tells a person who broke their wrist and can’t pay $6,000 to fix it, “Well, you shouldn’t have broken your wrist“.

Read the rest of this entry »

Delivering for voters

If Democrats aren’t providing voters with a great message, are they providing voters with something of substance? Good question. It usually helps your reelection chances if you can provide voters with accomplishments that make them want to vote for you again. What’s the Democratic majority’s track record when it comes to niceties that Congress has given voters? It’s not insubstantial, but not great.

Read the rest of this entry »

« Older Entries